slab-side bull-barrel and a fiber optic front sight is a winning combo. The GP100 vs SP101: Which is Better For Personal Protection? . If you buy a stainless GP100, you can do a cheap and easy trigger job on it as follows: take it apart following the instructions in the manual (don't disassemble the trigger group, just remove it from the gun). Am I correct? The GP100 is not as expense as a 686 or a 627. Any input is appreciated. Just my opinion of course but I don't see a valid application for a 4" SP10-1. How are each of them on trigger pull,accuracy, ruggedness,and value. This post is part of the series: SMART Goal Resources & Strategies, Team management and coaching are key soft skills for managers. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. As others have said the 686 and GP100 are mid sized frames while the SP101 is a small frame. .357 revolvers require no mod or special equipment to fire .38 special, that's correct. Ruger GP100 vs S&W 686 6” Barrel .357 Thread starter SailingNut; Start date Apr 18, 2018; Which do you prefer? No Sponsors Allowed! Or is the Redhawk possibly better in some way than a GP100? work got slow and had to sale it. We put two iconic revolvers together to compare and contrast differences and similarities. if I were to buy a packing pistol it would be either a Glock 20, Smith 69, or a SP 101. Posts must be somewhat related to firearms and must comply with the Global Reddit Rules. After comparison, the GP100 is evaluated as the better pistol for personal protection and concealed carry. The only revolver I ever shot was a 686, and fuck me was it nice. Been looking for a 2.5" S&W 686, but after having looked at over 20 of them locally, they all either had a canted barrel or significant scuffs/scratches in the finish. Is this right? I have owned an 2.5" SP101 and 2.5" 686. loved that gun. I like the 357 but the 38 is good for newer shooters which I have in my life. Someone mentioned the Smith 69, a five shot revolver, another EXCELENT choice. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. Sounds like I should get the ruger. I've purchased 2, new S&W Revolvers, one a 22LR Model 63, and a model 60 .357. I've owned two GP100's and a few different SW revolvers and for me Smith is generally a small step above Ruger out of the box. There are some sub-models you can also look at. In order to meet the daily demands of physical training, the Trainee Operations Staff suggest at a minimum each trainee should be able to complete the following upon entry into the Police Training Academy: Although trainees are only required to run a mile and half on the test, this in no way should suggest that is the longest distance we will run as a group. Smith double breaks sooner which is nice. The GP100 is and always has been an incredibly strong revolver. If you have any other input on this or any other .357 revolvers let me know. 7 shots will do. It's just and average condition, somewhat worn pistol. Tried all three and went the S&W route. Just had someone I know do the GP100 & S&W686 debate. It is well-supported by the aftermarket, with a wide range of grips, speedloaders, sights, and other accessories. They can shoot everything from wimpy .38 target wadcutters to full-house .357 magnum hunting rounds, and everything in between. Re: GP100 vs S&W 686..357 MAG.. by dmoser.270 » Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:06 pm I had a 686 with a 6 1/2 in barrel and that thing was a shooter. This channel and TYMP Pistol Project are both fully viewer supported. It's not entirely unfounded. I certainly don't mind working on the trigger and changing the grips was already on the list. The GP100 is in current production and the security six series is not. Both great .357 revolvers, but the 686 had a better trigger and was a whole bunch less “clunky”.
Yes with a valid concealed carry permit, however it cannot be used to shoot a deer or dispatch a wounded deer. It's cheaper than a 686 and you can use the savings to get a trigger job and buy some ammo. The stock 686 has a clear advantage over the GP100 here: out of the box, the trigger of the 686 is smoother, with noticeably less stacking and a cleaner break in double-action and a precise, short single-action pull. I don't think the dude that it belonged to did any work on it, as a matter of fact he said he obtained it in the 80's or 90's, it was old is the point but it still worked like a charm. I Load a 45 colt to moderate pressures with a 325 grain cast moving 1100 fps, with 800 foot pounds of energy I find it very comfortable to shoot vs 357s. I'm in the market for a solid revolver and I've been bouncing between these two for quite some time. Final conclusions have been mixed on that. I want a .357 and my understanding is both of these can also fire 38 special? Ruger says they implemented the design change in their RedHawks to improve accuracy which it might but I can't see how the real reason they did it wasn't just to cut costs. When you have your skill level up, you can lay a nickel across the front sight and dry fire your gun, double action, without the coin falling off. Anyone have experience with both of these that could lend an opinion ? Do the responsible thing; buy one of each. If you want to work on the GP 100 trigger and replace the factory grips, you can turn a great revolver into an outstanding one. Thanks for the reply. A battle of the Titans so to speak. Mine are for home defense, range, and just personal enjoyment. I’ve narrowed it down to two options. My question is which do you think would provide the best shooting gun. One of the gun magazines back in the 1980's did a pretty thorough side by side comparison between the 686 and Python. I'm sure Ruger makes a decent revolver, but that 686 trigger was so fucking crisp. I think some Greek counter-terrorist folk use the GP100. The stock barrel that a 10/22 comes with is unfluted or non-fluted - means it is the same smooth sides from one end to the other. Different but close. I have a GP100 shooter. Anyone have experience with both of these that could lend an opinion ? Then reassemble and you're good to go. Appreciate all the responses here, I'm going to go with the Ruger. when it went a piece of me went with it. One of my favorites at the range. Many people like to say that if you're comparing the two you should buy a GP100 used and a 686 new. I think the difference between the 686 and 60 is that 686 is … The Redhawk is more comparable to the N-frame. If you get a 686, don't disassemble it at all, there is no need to, and the chances of damaging something are considerable. I rented a GP100 at my shooting range last week. Thanks for the GP100 .22 LR endorsement. It too has become quite rare and expensive as well. The hammer and trigger springs are seperate and can be lightened without effecting one another. Pre-lock 686's to be exact. I second the one of each school... plus a Colt Python and then a Dan Wesson... just to have a choice on Range Day. I have new shooters who won't be comfortable with that yet so I like the option of a 38 as well. I’ve narrowed it down to two options. 4 auto are stellar performers, while the venerable MORE: Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot Skipping Golden Frieza Would Be A Mistake. It's been a long time since I shot 38 special, how's the recoil on it compared to a 9mm, 40 on semi autos? Print; Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Next > Apr 18, 2015 #1 . The primary purpose of a SP101 is concealed carry plus it is a gun you can practice with … Aber es hat sich gelohnt!! The K/L frame is pretty fat to conceal carry and … I guess my wallet can blame all the nice people in this thread. Can you carry or possess a firearm on hotel property in Maine? 686 but probably only due to my association with an old gunsmith who can make the triggers on those 686's slick as a whistle. PS: Carry too? Please help by becoming a patron. Smith & Wesson 150853 686 Plus Magnum Single/Double Action .357. So I'm looking at purchasing my first revolver (not first gun) and wanted some input. The 686 is an extra $170 but I'm leaning towards it because I like the tapered barrel and I believe they have better triggers. I have never had somebody see it in person say "Man that WOULD be a pretty revolver if not for the tiny hole on the side.." most people just compliment it's looks. It just tames those 357 loads nicely. Well on my part as far as GP100 vs. 686 I bought a GP100 and at the same time bought a S&W 686 Competitor ( Performance center 686). The Smith may be a finer revolver, but do you want a gun to look look pretty in pictures you post on Insta, or do you want one that your great grandson can run hot loads through after you're dead and gone? Rather we are trying to make a case for 8 rounds of 357 vs. 6 rounds of 41/44 Magnum in a wilderness situation. I went 586 over GP100 and while the 100 is a great gun, I'm happy I made my decision. The idea is that this forces the various moving parts to rub against one another, smoothing the contact surfaces. Awesome revolver. Both will likely be fine, though the Ruger is simpler, more overbuilt, and a bit less refined. The .357 will kick harder (you can also go in-between, with .38 Special +P). Any input is appreciated. And yes, it is heavier than the 686. The 686 is really $$$$$ and the GP100 will also last a lifetime like the S&W, but for less $$$. You will just have to finger each and see which one feels best in your hand as they are BOTH world class guns. More Reviews ›› … The 686 is an extra $170 but I'm leaning towards it because I like the tapered barrel and I believe they have better triggers. I prefer the GP grip but that's an easy swap. Unless you drop it into a mud puddle there won't be any need to disassemble it again. Another thing, are all the internal components metal with the exception of the grip? While not a monumental effort in any way other than gameplay, Ogre Battle: Limited Edition's … The internal machining is pretty rough, but it's easy to clean up and get to a great trigger, and you can lighten the trigger pull with a Wolf spring kit. War eine teure Stunde: Leigebühr für 2 Waffen + Munition. Joined: Feb 2, 2013. Hi, I am getting a 357 revolver very soon.
Notification Operation Type In Wsdl, Mt Hood National Forest Address, Django Developer Salary In Bangalore, Otak Otak Homemade, How Much Sugar In Blue Lobster Rocket, Rustoleum High Heat Paint Uk, Diy Doterra Whisper, Maida Maavu Sweet, Jerome Grand Hotel Ghost Tour,