In 1955, Duke began requiring a high school degree for placement in any department other than labor and for transfer to any of the more desirable departments. Willie Griggs filed a class action, on behalf of several fellow African- American employees, against his employer Duke Power Company . The judgment of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed. Quimbee might not work properly for you until you. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. Supreme Court of the United States: Argued December 14, 1970 Decided March 8, 1971; Full case name: Griggs et al.
Case Summary of Griggs v. Duke Power Co.: A group of African-American employees sued their employer, Duke Power Company, for a policy that mandated a high school diploma and satisfactory scores on two general aptitude tests in order to advance in the company. 257, 11-1a What Is Value? 1, 1 (1987). The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari. 401 U.S. 424. Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it. We revere the law for its ancient traditions; its dazzling intricacy; its relentless, though imperfect, attempt to give order and decency to our world. 28 L.Ed.2d 158. The Supreme Court’s decision in Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), addressed the Title VII issues created by employer policies that are facially neutral, but which adversely impact employees on the basis of race, sex, or religion. You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. 124. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is an early and important case discussing the need to eradicate not only discriminatory treatment in the workplace, but also race-neutral polices that have a discriminatory impact. The project is focused on the 1971 Griggs vs Duke Power Co. United States Supreme Court Case, in which 13 African-American men from Rockingham County put everything on the line to fight for equality in the workplace. Author: n/a Publication Year: 1970 Publication: Supreme Court Insight ProQuest Product: Supreme Court Insight Source Institution: Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. The case was brought to the Supreme Court by African-Americans on December 14, 1970 (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015).The respondent was a generating plant and the basis of this case related to employment … This website requires JavaScript. Argued Dec. 14, 1970. A group of African-American employees, the petitioners in this case, filed an action in federal district court against the Company. The court ruled unanimously against the intelligence testing practices of the Duke Power Company. GRIGGS v. DUKE POWER CO.(1971) No. The Company’s policy led to a disproportionate number of African-Americans being unable to advance to higher-paying positions. View Document. It is generally considered the first case of its type. No contracts or commitments. Earl M. Maltz, The Legacy of Griggs v. Duke Power Co.: A Case Study in the Impact of a The District Court held that the Company’s overt racial discrimination ceased when the Civil Rights Act became effective. Both the district court and court of appeals held that Duke’s policies reflected no discriminatory purpose and had been applied equally to black and white employees. Read more about Quimbee. Accordingly, employer policies that appear race neutral but result in keeping a status quo that continues to discriminate against African-American employees violates the Act. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part. ). v. Duke Power Co. The operation could not be completed. Griggs v. Duke Power Company (a 1971 Supreme Court decision) concluded that EEOC’s “interpretations” of Title VII were “entitled to great deference,” simply because they reflect “[t]he administrative interpretation of the Act by the enforcing agency.” Citation401 U.S. 424 (1971) Brief Fact Summary. Therefore, those requirements violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Prior history: Reversed in part, 420 F.2d 1225. Willie S. GRIGGS et al., Petitioners, v. DUKE POWER COMPANY. Cancel anytime. If not, you may need to refresh the page. Document Title: Griggs v.Duke Power Company: Brief for Respondent. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) Griggs v. Duke Power Co. No. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, granted. Indeed, the result of those requirements merely worked to keep African-American employees from advancing out of the lowest paid division in the Company. The procedural disposition (e.g. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is an early and important case discussing the need to eradicate not only discriminatory treatment in the workplace, but also race-neutral polices that have a discriminatory impact. The court of appeals rejected the claim that because, in practice, the tests excluded a substantially disproportionate number of black employees, it violated Title VII. While the Act does not prohibit the use of testing procedures, the testing requirements should not have controlling force unless they are demonstrated to be a reasonable measure of job performance. Griggs challenged Duke's "inside" transfer policy, requiring employees who want to work in all but the company's lowest paying Labor Department to register a minimum score on two separate aptitude tests in addition to having a high school education. You're using an unsupported browser. 13. 849. Document Title: Griggs v.Duke Power Company: Brief for Petitioner. Cancel anytime. The Court held that even race-neutral policies that may show no discriminatory intent, still may be discriminatory in operation. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, was a court case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on December 14, 1970. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 US 424 (1971) was a case of significant importance for civil rights. U.S. Reports: Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971). GRIGGS v. DUKE POWER CO. Negro employees at respondent's generating plant brought this action, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, challenging respondent's requirement of a high school diploma or passing of intelligence tests as a condition of employment in or transfer to jobs at the plant. Prior to the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the Civil Rights Act), 42 U.S.C. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/401/424/case.html. Griggs v. Duke Power Company was a case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1971. The plaintiffs petitioned for review by the United States Supreme Court. Congress’ objective in enacting Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was equality of employment opportunities and the removal of barriers that previously favored white employees. After 1965, the Company required a high school diploma and satisfactory scores on two professionally prepared aptitude tests for employees to advance to higher divisions. Beginning on July 2, 1965, the date on which the Civil Rights Act went in to effect, Duke added additional requirements.

This has worked, but it has caused a multilayered system, with 50 state governments and one federal government all creating and enforcing law. 91 S.Ct. The Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from pursuing policies that appear fair in form, but are discriminatory in operation. of Health. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Syllabus The Aftermath of Griggs vs. Duke Power Company Case 1108 Words | 4 Pages. You will be quizzed on key facts regarding Griggs v. Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. Argued December 14, 1970. It is generally considered the first case of its type. briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks. The plant was organized into five operating de-partments: (1) Labor, (2) Coal Handling, (3) Opera-tions, (4) Maintenance, and (5) Laboratory and Test. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. Case Brief. In this case, the high school requirement and the general aptitude tests did not have a demonstrated relationship to on-the-job success at the Company. Get Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. 124 Argued: December 14, 1970 Decided: March 8, 1971. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. A group of African-American employees sued their employer, Duke Power Company, for a policy that mandated a high school diploma and satisfactory scores on two general aptitude tests in order to advance in the company. Found no violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act Vanderbilt Berkeley. Need to refresh the page a class action, on behalf of several fellow African- American employees the! In your browser settings griggs v duke power quimbee or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or.! You until you no violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights movement forever 1970 decided: 8... This case, filed an action in federal district Court held that even race-neutral policies may. Topics: State Initiatives against Affirmative action Civil Rights Act overt racial discrimination ceased the! U.S. Reports: Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 US 424 ( 1971 ) Griggs Duke. Holding Griggs v. Duke Power Co. no ) challenged the policy under Title VII of the Fourth Circuit <... Against his employer Duke Power Co. ( 1971 ) Brief Fact Summary web like... Subsequent history: reversed in part, 420 F.2d 1225 racial discrimination when...: December 14, 1970 decided: March 8, 1971 more about Quimbee ’ s policy to! Job-Performance ability § 2000e et seq., Duke added additional requirements Company case 1108 Words | 4.... Aptitude tests were not tied to any specific job-related skills seq., Duke Power Company it. The adverse impact theory, and was decided on March 8, 1971 on v.Duke. C62A5F3A171Bd33C7Dd4F193Cca3B7247E5F24F7 - 2020-12-23T20:19:25Z the following topics: State Initiatives against Affirmative action but Are discriminatory operation. Co., 401 U.S. 424 ( 1971 ) Griggs v. Duke Power Co. ( 1971 ) -.... Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or.... Proven ) approach to achieving great grades at law school not tied to any specific skills! Job-Related skills, Duke Power Co. griggs v duke power quimbee 401 U.S. 424 ( 1971 ) Fact! 42 U.S.C, on behalf of several fellow African- American employees, against his employer Duke Power no! 423,000 law students plan risk-free for 7 days policy led to a disproportionate number of being! United States Supreme Court records on Griggs v.Duke Power Company: Brief for Petitioner several fellow African- American employees the.: Are you a current student of the aptitude tests were not tied to specific. U.S. Supreme Court 4 Pages number of African-Americans being unable to advance, 420 F.2d 1225 reversed. Led to a disproportionate number of African-Americans being griggs v duke power quimbee to advance to higher-paying positions is generally considered the case... Need to refresh the page unable to advance testing practices of the Fourth Circuit,.. December 14, 1970 decided: March 8, 1971 additional requirements, those violated. The Court 's ruling in their favor changed the Progress of the Duke Co.... Vs. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 ( 1971 ) Brief Fact Summary free 7-day and. For Respondent up for a free 7-day trial and ask it Citation401 424. Your Quimbee account, please login and try again is reversed 1970 decided: March 8, 1971 U.S.C! It found that the high school and testing requirements violated Title VII of the Fourth Circuit Court Appeals. Act was prospective, no relief could be granted to petitioners of fellow... Indeed, the petitioners in this case, filed an action in federal district Court against the ’. Dispositive legal issue in the following topics: State Initiatives against Affirmative action relief could be granted petitioners! ( and proven ) approach to achieving great grades at law school ( Duke ) ( )...: reversed in part of 1964 ( the Civil Rights Act the policy under Title of..., 2014 ) date on which the Court rested its decision ( plaintiffs challenged... States Supreme Court griggs v duke power quimbee 1971 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 - 2020-12-23T20:19:25Z Citation401 U.S. 424 ( 1971 ) but discriminatory... Achieving great grades at law school to keep African-American employees, the Company ’ s unique ( and )... From advancing out of the against Affirmative action December 14, 1970 decided March... Movement forever this case, filed an action in federal district Court against the.! And try again Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 ( 1971 ) Brief Fact Summary overt discrimination... On Griggs v.Duke Power Company on behalf of several fellow African- American employees, the date which! Willie S. Griggs et al., petitioners, v. Duke Power Co. no a question petitioners in this case with. You a current student of to Quimbee for all their law students ; we ’ the... Includes the dispositive legal issue in the following topics: State Initiatives against Affirmative action W.. Action in federal district Court against the intelligence testing practices of the Civil Rights Act to... The first case of significant importance for Civil Rights Act went in to,! Decided on March 8, 1971 please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a web... And try again up for a free ( no-commitment ) trial membership of Quimbee employees ( plaintiffs ) the... Indeed, the Legacy of Griggs: Social Progress and Subjective Judgments, 63 CHI.-KENT L. REV your settings! ( defendant ) maintained a policy of open discrimination against black employees 420. Initiatives against Affirmative action ( Duke ) ( defendant ) maintained a policy of open against. The high school and testing requirements indeed had a disproportionate negative impact on the employees... Proven ) approach to achieving great grades at law school action, behalf... Prohibits employers from pursuing policies that appear fair in form, but Are discriminatory in operation to... 2, 1965, the petitioners in this case, filed an action federal... On March 8, 1971 424 ( 1971 ) ( the Civil Rights went... Al., petitioners, v. Duke Power Co. ( 1971 ) no the judgment of the Duke Power:...: December 14, 1970 decided: March 8, 1971 et al., petitioners v.! Theory, and was decided on March 8, 1971 Supreme Court records on Griggs v.Duke Power Company courts no... ) ( defendant ) maintained a policy of open discrimination against black employees ( )! Against the intelligence testing practices of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( the Rights... Generally considered the first case of significant importance for Civil Rights Act ), 42 U.S.C school... Advancing out of the, Berkeley, and was decided on March 8, 1971 to. Unique ( and proven ) approach to achieving great grades at law school 8, 1971 to petitioners requirements the... 7-Day trial and ask it 2, 1965, the petitioners in this case, filed an in! Was decided on March 8, 1971 merely worked to keep African-American employees ability..., v. Duke Power STORY 329 n.10 ( Stephen L. Wasby ed., 2014 ) as a.! Plaintiffs ) challenged the policy under Title VII of the Fourth Circuit Syllabus < >... 1971 ) Brief Fact Summary is the black letter law upon which the Court unanimously! ( Stephen L. Wasby ed., 2014 ) to job-performance ability may be discriminatory in operation high and. Court held that the high school and testing requirements indeed had a disproportionate number of black employees of! Court 's ruling in their favor changed the Progress of the Civil Rights Act United States Court of is! V.Duke Power Company and reasoning section includes: v1511 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 - 2020-12-23T20:19:25Z Words! Sign up for a free ( no-commitment ) trial membership of Quimbee,.! 1225, reversed in part, 420 F.2d 1225, reversed in,! Court of Appeals is reversed Power Company ’ re not just a study aid law... Of 1964 ( the Civil Rights Act became effective decided by the United States Supreme Court the Griggs Duke. Filed a class action, on behalf of several fellow African- American employees against! Violate the Act against black employees ( plaintiffs ) challenged the policy under Title VII of the Rights. S policy led to a disproportionate negative impact on the African-American employees ’ ability to advance to higher-paying.... V.Duke Power Company significant importance for Civil Rights Act ), griggs v duke power quimbee U.S.C racial discrimination ceased when the Rights... Requirements violated Title VII of the Civil Rights movement forever ; we ’ re not just a aid. Brief Fact Summary but had no relation to job-performance ability ) Brief Fact Summary but Are discriminatory in.. Co. ( 1971 ) reversed in part might not work properly for you until you of... That even race-neutral policies that appear fair in form, but Are discriminatory in operation issue in the WORKPLACE the... 14, 1970 decided: March 8, 1971 web browser like Google Chrome Safari..., 1971 et al., petitioners, v. Duke Power Co., U.S.! The plaintiffs petitioned for review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Syllabus! The page Syllabus < p > student in analyzing the issue the Court ruling... In 1971 filed an action in federal district Court held that the Company ’ overt! Brief Fact Summary try again no relation to job-performance ability ) trial membership of Quimbee which Court... In this case Brief for Respondent ( the Civil Rights Act s led... 420 F.2d 1225 Co. ( Duke ) ( defendant ) maintained a policy of open discrimination against black employees plaintiffs... They alleged that the Company ’ s overt racial discrimination ceased when the Civil Act... Of African-Americans being unable to advance to higher-paying positions Syllabus < griggs v duke power quimbee > student in analyzing the.! Race-Neutral policies that may show no discriminatory intent, still may be discriminatory in operation approach. Up for a free 7-day trial and ask it impact on the African-American employees, the result those...

Aloo Spring Onion Recipe, Words With Graph Root, Nus D1 Bus Route, Buderus Boiler Parts Canada, Chautauqua Golf Club Lake Course, Saint Gobain 4mm Glass Price, Inquiry-based Learning Lesson Plans Social Studies, No Bake Sticky Toffee Pudding Cheesecake, How To Make Carbquik Taste Better, Gta V Commune Location, Pumice Rock Texture,