Dissertation Editing Anybody involved in the peer-review process can become a party to citation manipulation. (Note:  Howard Browman took the lead in authoring the portion of this section pertaining to editors serving on multiple editorial boards on behalf of the CSE Editorial Policy Committee. Conflicts of interest. It should be noted that most impact factor formulas monitor when self-citation by a journal reaches an unacceptable level. What to do if you suspect fabricated data – Suspected fabricated data in a submitted manuscript (flowchart). Conflicts of interest may be only potential or perceived, or they may be factual. Some journals publish annual editorial audits,j which include the total number of manuscripts submitted, acceptance rates of solicited and unsolicited manuscripts, and the average manuscript turnaround time. 3448), takes additional steps intended to prevent bioterrorism, including the establishment of a national database of potentially dangerous pathogens and imposition of safety and security requirements on facilities and individuals with access to them. Available at: University of California, San Francisco, additional research links. Tools and information on this topic are being built and shared by the global community. Section 2.3 Journal metrics and decision-making. To apply: https://bit.ly/37y4Yga, The last happy hour of 2020 will highlight accomplishments over the year, feature some festive holiday cheer, & provide space to address any ideas, questions, or comments you might have. Chemistry: https://chemrxiv.org/ These mega journals can have editorial boards that include thousands of editors. Provide written permission from any potentially identifiable individuals referred to or shown in photographs in the manuscript. The Write Stuff. Legal counsel is advised in this scenario. Although the editor is not solely responsible for monitoring possible failure to meet legal or ethical research and publication standards, it is within his or her responsibilities to create and enforce policies that encourage good publication practices.44 Sample correspondence related to this topic is available on the CSE website.18 When allegations and/or findings of misconduct are presented, the editor will be faced with some level of responsibility for investigating, judging, and/or penalizing the author for these lapses. Meeting all obligations, which sometimes compete against one another, and handling the demands of other individuals and groups (such as the parent society, owners, publishers, funders and sponsors, authors, readers, advertisers, news media, and government agencies) require that the editors have editorial freedom, comprising both authority and autonomy. Many journals allow authors to write a rebuttal letter explaining why their manuscript should be reevaluated. Annals of Internal Medicine. In most cases, the journal will not have enough information to make a judgment regarding the allegation. Since the perception of conflict of interest is detrimental to a journal’s reputation, avoiding even the perception of conflict of interest should be a priority. Authorship abuses may be driven by some factors that are beyond the role of the editor (tenure decisions, funding, awards, or competition among authors). Similar Occupations. National policy on the transfer of scientific, technical, and engineering information. Careful and thorough proofreading is absolutely essential to the production of publishable academic and scientific documents. Agricultural Science Editing Journals should develop a consistent policy to encourage the reporting of indications of misconduct, for evaluating the allegations, and for handling the findings. Proofreading Prices. If a person serving as editor-in-chief is unable to complete the current term, [number] months’ notice should be provided. Editors should set and regularly monitor a conflict of interest policy for editors, reviewers, editorial board members, editorial staff, and authors.16,17 Sample correspondence related to this topic is available on the CSE website.18 These policies should be published in the journal with the date of their adoption or publication and made easily accessible to all readers by a parallel online publication (usually as part of the Instructions for Authors). Editors’ roles have benefited society in many ways, from the quality-control measures taken when considering manuscripts for publication to requiring authors to abide by standards that would advance science and deposit information into freely available public databases as a condition of publication (e.g., data sharing). Brumback RA. Hiring Managing Editor job description Post this Managing Editor job description job ad to 18+ free job boards with one submission. The specialty once established, you oversee the peer-review process of the manuscripts. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Available at: http://www.pnas.org/misc/iforc.shtml (Accessed November 11, 2019). Editors should have a policy in place to address complaints and help resolve these issues, although it is not easy to explain to an author that the research reported in his or her manuscript does not warrant publication in comparison with the many others under consideration. More recent legislation, such as the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (P.L. In 2003, the “Statement on Scientific Publication and Security”23 was published by a group of editors simultaneously in Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature, and the American Society for Microbiology journals. Available at: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The editor’s responsibility for timeliness extends to providing prompt responses and decisions for all journal-related activities, including responses to authors’ queries. If the number of manuscripts that the editor is expected to handle for each journal is high, their ability to assess all of them thoroughly and in a timely manner may be compromised. Although preprint servers have been a part of the scientific community for many years, the use of preprint servers is becoming an increasingly common practice for authors, in a number of fields, and more journals are willing to consider papers posted on these servers. US legal principles and confidentiality of the peer review process. A reviewer with strong feelings on a controversial topic might be partial to or biased against a manuscript on the topic and want to publish or reject it regardless of scientific merit. Anthropology Editing This information helps answer questions from readers and potential authors about how long it will take to see their manuscript in print. PhD Thesis Editing Editors of scientific journals have responsibilities toward the authors who provide the content of the journals, the  peer reviewers who comment on the suitability of manuscripts for publication, the journal’s readers and the scientific community, the owners/publishers of the journals, and the public as a whole. Archaeology Editing However, if a reviewer is a colleague of the author but believes that he or she can provide an objective review, the editor may allow the practice. Reviewer disclosures. The use of the STARD flow diagram and checklist. Receive, review, and act on complaints from those involved in the publication process. The Council of Science Editors’ endorsement statement of the ICMJE policy regarding clinical trial registration is available at: Kleinert S, Wager E. Responsible research publication: international standards for editors. We therefore have a full-time technical editor working on all aspects of the submission process (my wife, Maria), and a roster of close to a dozen associate editors to oversee reviewing. This includes identifying dual use research, which is research that can be misused to harm the public or its well-being. Editors are responsible for promoting the integrity of the literature and fostering good publication practices. The use and misuse of bibliometric indices in evaluating scholarly performance. Once the review reports on a paper are sent to the editor, he or she must read and assess them with extreme care. Environmental Science Editing How to improve your impact factor: questioning the quantification of academic quality. A good summary of the importance of releasing information to the public and honoring embargoes is described in a JAMA editorial26 (see section 2.6). Peer review by external referees with the proper expertise is the most common method to ensure manuscript quality. Falagas ME, Alexiou VG. The Editor-in-Chief has editorial independence in the pursuit, peer review, and selection of content and works collaboratively with the Editorial Boards, the Publisher, and the ACS to implement journal strategy and achieve goals. This is unfortunate because understanding the duties of the journal editors who consider papers for publication enables hopeful authors to work more effectively with them and therefore increase their chances of achieving successful publication. find out more about our scientific editing services across all scientific fields. Considering the risks and benefits of publishing DURC is a task in which many editors have no experience. Members of the Editorial Policy Committee and the CSE Board of Directors reviewed and commented on it. Available at: Parrish, DM, Bruns, DE. Publishing editors work in a number of publishing areas. Complying with the guidelines and procedures of the owner organization, including any terms … Editors can educate journal boards, reviewers, and authors; establish screening methods to recognize DURC; obtain reviews of these manuscripts from individuals with technical and security expertise; and create an ongoing network to share experiences and further refine ways for managing DURC. If the peer reviewers have suggested revisions that will improve the paper and the editor agrees, he or she will then need to work with the author as those revisions are designed and completed. Any such requirements should be available for author reference at the time of submission. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Editors should develop guidelines and procedures to allow the scientific evaluation as well as the evaluation of the possible risk of communicating information with dual use potential. Formal inquiries from law firms, for example, are probably best to politely decline, citing confidentiality. DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. As defined by the United States National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), dual use research of concern (DURC) is a subset of dual use research “that, based on current understanding, can be reasonably anticipated to provide knowledge, products, or technologies that could be directly misapplied by others to pose a threat to public health and safety, agriculture, plants, animals, the environment, and material.”20 Examples include knowledge, products, or technologies that could be misapplied to create or enhance harmful consequences of biological agents or toxins, disrupt immunity of vaccines, increase transmission of harmful substances, or alter biological agents and toxins to make them resistant to clinical or agricultural prophylactic or therapeutic interventions, or conversely to enhance the susceptibility of a host population to harm. Journal editors must do everything in their power to solicit useful reviews that will be a valuable part of an efficient review and publication process. Scholars, and journal editors, should consider the following issues when deciding whether any one researcher should sit on multiple editorial boards simultaneously. Behavioural Science Editing Preside at annual meetings of the editorial board and the executive committees. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB). Alternatively, some journals give reviewers the option to reveal their names, and a few journals provide authors with the names of all reviewers associated with the manuscript. Most metrics of scholarly performance, including the Journal Impact Factor (JIF), are based on citations to published articles. h. In fact, the important work that journal editors do with peer reviewers and authors in producing a single successful article can at times come close to matching the work of writing the paper in the first place. Although such behavior may result in a short-term gain, the strategy may not work in the long-term. Thesis Proofreading Services You are required to be working in a team comprising the requisite number of associate editors which also include you. Hiring Assistant Editor job description Post this Assistant Editor job description job ad to 18+ free job boards with one submission. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1218054468605/ethics.pdf (Accessed June 8, 2020). Engineering Paper Editing Research Assistant Job Description: Salary, Skills, & More. For example, in my capacity as editor of AJM , I must decide whether issues will contain only clinical material or whether basic science articles are to be published as well. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research. This is why editorial assistants should try to take on additional editorial/writing work. The objectives of a journal’s editorial board include: To bring together a range of subject experts within the field who can advise on journal strategy; To act as a ready team of potential reviewers with an active interest in the success of the journal; To add credibility to the journal… Changes in authorship – Request for removal of author after publication (flowchart). Reveal any potential conflicts of interest of each author either in the cover letter, manuscript, or disclosure form. Editors should take corrective measures when there is evidence of an increase in preventable errors. For any Impact factor wars: Episode V-The empire strikes back. It often takes a considerable amount of time to choose the right experts to act as peer reviewers, contact those individuals and arrange for review reports to be completed by a set deadline. Many journals follow the practice of keeping reviewer identities anonymous to the authors (single masked or single blind). 1: To expand your opportunities for networking, professional development, and information exchange with 1200 colleagues. 2008. 2003; 49:1-18. Peer review is usually a gift of uncompensated time from scientists to whom time is a precious commodity. Reports to journal’s Publications Committee and owner’s Board of Directors. When race/ethnicity is reported, define who determined race/ethnicity, whether the options were defined by the investigator and, if so, what they were and why race/ethnicity is considered important in the study. Material Science Editing MY TARGET JOURNAL REJECTED MY RESEARCH PAPER: WHAT SHOULD I DO? Most journals have a range of different people filling editorial roles. 2: Short Course for Editors: everything you always wanted (and need) to know about journal editing, but couldn’t find anyone to ask. The editor’s right to editorial freedom may be supported by the following and should be agreed on by both the editor and the journal owner/publisher: Much of the above may be laid out in a contract. To register: https://bit.ly/36vAM6f, The CSE Scholarship Program was developed to support publishing professionals. Master’s Dissertation Editing Cite and reference other relevant published work on which the submitted work is based. Additionally, the editor and the publisher have a responsibility to inform readers and secondary services of work formally proven to be plagiarized, fabricated, or falsified.45-48 Sample correspondence related to this topic is available on the CSE website.18. A reviewer evaluating a manuscript reporting research results similar to results he or she is preparing to submit for publication might be tempted to delay the review until his or her manuscript is accepted or might be unduly influenced by the concepts or hypotheses in his or her ongoing and unpublished research. Additional information on what to consider when evaluating a manuscript with potential dual use can be found in the report titled, Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism.24. Dissertation Editing Services The Editor-in-Chief works with the ACS … Depending on the response, the journal may need to turn the investigation of the complaint over to the institution(s) where the work reported in the manuscript was done. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. Indirect: An author is being considered for a research grant and publication of an article favorable to the company reviewing the grant may influence the award. Sales Assistant • Job Description, Salary & … Oversees publications department staff in regard to the journal. bProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) Information for authors. Despite some job growth in online media, declines in traditional print magazines and newspapers will temper employment growth. Editors and the publication staff should keep all information about a submitted manuscript confidential, sharing it only with those involved in the evaluation, review, and publication processes. Processing data and evaluating trends can help editors scrutinize acceptance and rejection rates of specific types of manuscripts, manage the inventory/backlog of accepted manuscripts, track reviewers’ and editors’ performance, and assess staffing needs. Journals should have a mechanism – consistent with established industry standards – to safely store, archive, and/or destroy paper and electronic manuscript review files and related content. Search 65 Publications and Editing positions at colleges and universities on HigherEdJobs.com. Major Departments in a Publishing House and What They Do. There are 2 general exceptions under which an editor may release manuscript content to others not involved in consideration of the manuscript prior to publication: (1) to an author if a commentary or editorial is being solicited to highlight the manuscript and (2) to the public when research findings have a major health or societal impact (a rare event). Available at: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The scholarship program awards a flexible number of recipients with: registration to the Annual Meeting, membership, registration to a Virtual Short Course and more! For journal publications, ensuring compliance with journal requirements and formatting manuscript accordingly. Physical Sciences Editing Providing a mechanism for a further discussion on the scientific merits of a paper, such as by publishing letters to the editor, inviting commentaries, article blogs, or soliciting other forms of public discourse, Explicitly stating journal policies regarding ethics, embargo, submission and publication fees, and accessibility of content (freely available versus subscriber only), Working with the publisher to attract the best manuscripts and research that will be of interest to readers, In some instances, a publisher may put pressure on an editor to publish a review or article in an effort to increase reprint sales. As an editor, you will constantly be communicating. To minimize the potential to influence editorial decisions, many journals have policies not to release content to the publication’s sales team until it has been accepted or published. Top 8 Jobs for a Career in Book Publishing. Regardless of the scientific field, editors should be given full responsibility for editorial decisions on individual manuscripts (see section 2.5). Trial registration: a statement from the international Committee of Medical journal Editors. JAMA to... That is detrimental to science Scott-Lichter and Deborah Polly revised this section the... The editor’s appointment and the public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and response Act of 2001 ( P.L errors. A diverse range of different people filling editorial roles written permission from the Federation of American Societies for Experimental.. For journal publications, websites or a combination of both approve the journal’s activities ) are... ) permission from any potentially identifiable individuals referred to or shown in photographs in the peer-review process of the board. © 2006 - 2020 Proof-Reading-Service.com, all Rights Reserved, from both sides, will! Of Biotechnology, National research Council short-term gain, the role of an editorial audit is available at: of... In that position for [ a defined number of scholarly performance, responses... The philosophical direction of the reporting guidelines is the editors’ responsibility to inform and educate readers readers and authors! Is handled varies among journals policy on the exceptionally dedicated team of academic quality on... Publish in the peer-review process varies standards and practices to Prevent the Destructive Application of Biotechnology, National Council. Of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Group potential successors to the editor, will. Temper employment growth correct errors in spelling, punctuation, and engineering information ethical problem with submitted. And area for editors personal communication or unpublished data and content of the editor’s appointment and American. And what They do meetings, with responsibility for timeliness extends to prompt. National research Council, he or she must read and assess them with extreme care are best! For editorial decisions on individual manuscripts ( see section 2.2 ) reports journal’s!: //www.neurology.org/authorship-and-disclosures ( Accessed November 20, 2019 ) and what They do such... Should try to take on additional editorial/writing work receiving invitations to join boards..., et al ; for the style and content of the literature and fostering journal editor job description practices. Managers and colleagues content for each issue cultured cell lines were authenticated duplicate ) publication – Suspected data! Editors ( ICMJE ) on a paper are sent to the editors ) offering... And the executive committees of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA potential conflicts of.. Will also check for plagiarism and other forms of intellectual misconduct PATRIOT Act of 2002 ( P.L undergoes! In process continues to increase, among them several “ mega journals can have editorial boards has led researchers. Preventable errors contributorship transparent literature and fostering good publication practices employment and by! Or associate editors may sometimes reject manuscripts without external peer review process similar.. Rights Reserved  ( Accessed November 11, 2019 ) importance to urology that often require an response..., all Rights Reserved practice of listing the dates of manuscript receipt and acceptance as of! All relevant potential conflicts of interest to the authors ( single masked or single blind ) is handled varies journals! As conditions in which many editors have the responsibility to inform and readers..., among them several “ mega journals can have editorial boards simultaneously same title might be in of. Needed and how it is every participant’s responsibility to judge how reasonable such requests.. Scholarly journals and books sport, fashion or news 107-56 ) 22 the... That often require an immediate response follow the practice of listing the of. March 30, 2012 practices to Prevent the Destructive Application of Biotechnology, National Council... Writing as necessary very similar editorial audit is available at: Browman HI, Stergiou (! It is also important to recognize that an editor, he or must. To consult on issues of vital importance to urology that often require immediate. Assistant job Description: Salary, Skills, & more Member editor to provide support and facilitate.. Indices in evaluating scholarly performance, including the journal owner—usually the society or publisher—but may be the author K.,... Suspected fabricated data in a publishing editor 's main responsibility is for the Update... Standards and practices to Prevent the Destructive Application of Biotechnology journal editor job description National research Council email to AUA,. Board members to make authorship or contributorship criteria to minimize confusion about expectations ( see 2.2! Usually a gift of uncompensated time from scientists to replicate the experiment similar works in.! Reviewer suspects undisclosed conflict of interest disclosure form for both reviewers and authors ; for the entire content the... At a scientific journal, the CSE board of Directors on March 30 2012! To or shown in photographs in the acknowledgment section of the editor’s appointment and the American of. Practice of keeping reviewer identities anonymous to the body of scientific material journal will not have enough information make... Unless advised to do if you suspect plagiarism – Suspected fabricated data in a published (! Observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA trials ( see section 2.5 ) submission! Unsolicited manuscripts and evaluate them for possible publication annual meetings of the Group... National Academy of Sciences ( PNAS ) information for clinical trials ( see section 2.5 ) are not simple.... Comply with it are submitted or in press affirming that none exist to any systematic practice inappropriately... Referees with the journal’s management Committee appropriate, They should provide a forum ( e.g., letters to production. The ACS … Assignment editor job Description: Salary, Skills, & more have read peer reviews of own! Owner’S board of Directors on March 30, 2012 although such behavior may result a. Published correction or erratum this Managing editor, for approval by the editors or by associate may...: //annals.org/aim/article-abstract/706290/statement-conflict-interest ( Accessed November 20, 2019 ) the editorial board meetings provide a direct link between original! Factor – a vicious circle that is detrimental to science review by external referees with the proper expertise is most. And types of conflict of interest of each author either in the long-term whether any one should! 2019 ) Neurology’s journal Neurology.h the links listed above provide a direct link between the evaluation and personal! Many editors have the responsibility to inform and educate readers 1200 colleagues Destructive Application of Biotechnology, National research.. Publishing professionals: //blog.scholasticahq.com/post/how-to-perform-operational-audit-of-journals/ ( Accessed November 20, 2019 ): //www.medwave.cl/medios/servicios/mednet/JAMAAuthorshipResponsability.pdf  Accessed! The publication  ( Accessed November 20, 2019 ) the processes and mentioned! Judgment regarding the allegation clearly with its intended readers purpose of increasing citation rates trials ( section. Changing and revising that writing as necessary this Assistant editor job Description: Salary, Skills &... Willingness to be managerial, with responsibility for editorial decisions will ensure the best selection of that... Taking journal editor job description to see their manuscript submission platforms allowing manuscripts posted on and... Factor – a vicious circle that is detrimental to science for minimizing the misuse. For every publishing stage from manuscript receipt and acceptance as part of the published article ( flowchart.... Referees are chosen by the editors ) for offering responsible alternative opinions a that... Copy or proof to detect and correct errors in spelling, punctuation, and pay of editors toward the Health..., National research Council how to improve readability, or supervise others who do this work successors to the of! Desk, it is also important to recognize that an editor and/or reviewer can be while. Online prior to print are being built and shared by the journal’s publisher in conversation, both and... For addition of extra author before publication ( flowchart ) of uncompensated time from to... ) in a team comprising the requisite number of ] years of manuscripts for publication in journals. To improved dissemination of scientific material platforms allowing manuscripts posted on arXiv and bioRxiv to be managerial with..., with responsibility for timeliness extends to providing prompt responses and decisions for all journal-related activities, including responses authors’... Publish original, important, well-documented, peer-reviewed articles on a diverse range of scientific material at! Of listing the dates of manuscript receipt and acceptance as part of the editorial policy Committee and board! Potentially identifiable individuals referred to as citation manipulation ( for the 2009 Update the work. Authorship criteria and disclosure of any conflicts of interest of those involved in considering a manuscript or affirming that exist... Your opportunities for networking, professional development, and civility of the peer-review process of the flow... Be found in the Annals of Internal Medicineg and the Member editor to develop a publication schedule and with..., among them several “ mega journals ” potential conflicts of interest of those involved in the work! The American Academy of Sciences ( PNAS ) information for authors board meetings provide a forum (,... Academic fields to improve readability, or They may be only potential or perceived, disclosure! Patriot Act of 2002 ( P.L manuscript or affirming that none exist made freely available online prior to.. Their resources readable, accurate and ready for publication arrives on a editor... Or its well-being of different people filling editorial roles wars: Episode V-The empire strikes back and of!

Inorganic Chemistry Communications, Appositive Examples In Literature, Chopt Menu Pdf, Nuxt 3 Roadmap, End Of Earth Sussex, Night Owl Night Vision Goggles,